Related Party Transactions — Overview and Summary of Rules
The related party rules under Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) §1031(f) are
designed to prevent planned exchanges between related parties seeking
to cash out property and avoid paying capital gains tax. The IRS continues
to strictly scrutinize related party exchanges, but has recently indicated
a greater willingness to allow exchanges between related parties when
the parties establish that there was no basis shifting and no tax avoidance
motive.
Basis shifting with a related party to avoid capital gains tax – How it
works:
If a taxpayer purchases a property for $100,000, his tax basis is
$100,000. If he later sells the property for more than his basis, he will
be taxed on the difference – i.e. his gain. Under IRC §1031, however, the
taxpayer may defer paying taxes on the gain by exchanging the property
for another property of equal or greater value.
Some taxpayers have attempted to cash out their property and avoid
paying taxes on their gain by exchanging with a related party, as illustrated
by the following example:
Taxpayer Tom owns Low Acre—a property with a $100,000 basis which
he would like to sell to Smith for $500,000. Tom does not want to pay the
capital gains tax on his $400,000 gain (est. $100,000 combined state/federal taxes). To avoid this result, Tom swaps Low Acre for High Acre, which
is owned by Mother.Mother’s basis in High Acre is $500,000. Tom now
owns High Acre with a basis of $100,000 and Mother owns Low Acre with
a basis of $500,000. Mother now sells Low Acre to Smith for $500,000
with no gain and therefore no tax. Mother can now hand over $500,000 in
tax- free cash to Tom. The related party rules are designed to prevent this
result.
For anyone contemplating an exchange with a related party, they should
first understand the definition of a “related party” according to the IRC.
And, second, they should also understand the rules and restrictions on
transactions involving related parties
Definition of Related Parties:
A related party is anyone who bears a relationship to the taxpayer, as described in IRC Section 267(b). Related parties
include members of the same family—parents, siblings, ancestors (e.g.
parents and grandparents) and lineal descendants (e.g. children and grandchildren) and spouses, but do not include step-parents, uncles, aunts,
in-laws, cousins, nephews, nieces and former spouses. A taxpayer will be
treated as related to an entity, such as a corporation or partnership, if the
taxpayer either directly or indirectly (through family members) owns more
than 50% of the shares or capital interest in such entities. Related parties
also include certain fiduciary relationships described in Section 267(b).
Summary of the Related Party Rules
Buying from or swapping with a related party:
An exchanger may buy
from or swap with a related party if the related party also does an exchange and both parties hold their respective replacement properties for
two years. See Revenue Procedure 2002-83. However, the IRS has also
issued private letter rulings (“PLRs”) that are inconsistent with Rev. Proc
2002-83. See PLR 200440002 and PLR 200616005. Note, however, that
PLRs are not legal precedent and should not be relied upon as such—unlike a Revenue Procedure which may be relied upon for guidance
Selling to a related party:
An exchanger may sell to a related party if the
related party holds the property for two years and the exchanger holds the
replacement property for two years. IRC §1031(f).
Exception to two year hold:
Under any of the above scenarios, there will
be no two year holding violation if the disposition is caused by the death
of either the taxpayer or related party; involuntary conversion of one of
the subject properties; or if the taxpayer can establish that the exchange or
disposition did not have as its principal purpose the avoidance of Federal
income tax. IRC §1031(f) (2); and see PLR 200709036, PLR 200712013, PLR
200728008 and PLR 200706001
Be aware of the “catch all” provision of §1031(f)(4):
Under all of the above
scenarios, the exchange will nonetheless be disallowed if a transaction
or series of transactions was designed to avoid the application of the
related party rules under IRC §1031(f). In other words the exchange will be
disallowed if it is established that the transaction was structured to avoid
the related party rules
Summary:
The related party rules can be complex and any violation of the
rules could result in an exchange being disallowed. Any taxpayer considering an exchange involving a related party should seek the advice of their
tax or legal advisor.
Click Here to View This Article as a PDF